wild type flag axin1 Search Results


96
Bio-Techne corporation human/mouse/rat axin-1 antibody
Human/Mouse/Rat Axin 1 Antibody, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human/mouse/rat axin-1 antibody/product/Bio-Techne corporation
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human/mouse/rat axin-1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Korean Cell Line Bank nci-n87
Nci N87, supplied by Korean Cell Line Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nci-n87/product/Korean Cell Line Bank
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nci-n87 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc wild type flag axin1
Wild Type Flag Axin1, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/wild type flag axin1/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
wild type flag axin1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Korean Cell Line Bank mkn-45
Mkn 45, supplied by Korean Cell Line Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mkn-45/product/Korean Cell Line Bank
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mkn-45 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Addgene inc wild type wt flag axin1
Deletion of the GSK3β and β-catenin–binding domains strongly increases β-catenin signaling. A, Schematic diagram depicting the FLAG-tagged <t>AXIN1</t> mutant expression vectors that were generated. Amino acid numbers are based on the long 862 amino acid isoform of AXIN1. For clarity, we refer to each domain by one reported binding partner, but especially for the MEKK1, CK1, and PP2A domains; additional binding proteins have been reported. B, Immunoblot for FLAG-tagged AXIN1 to demonstrate expression of the expected variants after HEK293T transfection. Tubulin was used as loading control. C, A β-catenin reporter assay was conducted in HEK293T cells expressing WT AXIN1 and variants lacking the depicted domains. The β-catenin reporter activities are shown as WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios (in triplicate, three independent experiments), in which the value obtained for <t>wild-type</t> AXIN1 was arbitrarily set to 1. As a positive control for increased β-catenin signaling, Wnt3A conditioned medium was added to empty vector (EV)-transfected cells (EV+Wnt3A). Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; ns, nonsignificant.
Wild Type Wt Flag Axin1, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/wild type wt flag axin1/product/Addgene inc
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
wild type wt flag axin1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
OriGene human axin1
Deletion of the GSK3β and β-catenin–binding domains strongly increases β-catenin signaling. A, Schematic diagram depicting the FLAG-tagged <t>AXIN1</t> mutant expression vectors that were generated. Amino acid numbers are based on the long 862 amino acid isoform of AXIN1. For clarity, we refer to each domain by one reported binding partner, but especially for the MEKK1, CK1, and PP2A domains; additional binding proteins have been reported. B, Immunoblot for FLAG-tagged AXIN1 to demonstrate expression of the expected variants after HEK293T transfection. Tubulin was used as loading control. C, A β-catenin reporter assay was conducted in HEK293T cells expressing WT AXIN1 and variants lacking the depicted domains. The β-catenin reporter activities are shown as WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios (in triplicate, three independent experiments), in which the value obtained for <t>wild-type</t> AXIN1 was arbitrarily set to 1. As a positive control for increased β-catenin signaling, Wnt3A conditioned medium was added to empty vector (EV)-transfected cells (EV+Wnt3A). Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; ns, nonsignificant.
Human Axin1, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human axin1/product/OriGene
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human axin1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
OriGene human axin
Deletion of the GSK3β and β-catenin–binding domains strongly increases β-catenin signaling. A, Schematic diagram depicting the FLAG-tagged <t>AXIN1</t> mutant expression vectors that were generated. Amino acid numbers are based on the long 862 amino acid isoform of AXIN1. For clarity, we refer to each domain by one reported binding partner, but especially for the MEKK1, CK1, and PP2A domains; additional binding proteins have been reported. B, Immunoblot for FLAG-tagged AXIN1 to demonstrate expression of the expected variants after HEK293T transfection. Tubulin was used as loading control. C, A β-catenin reporter assay was conducted in HEK293T cells expressing WT AXIN1 and variants lacking the depicted domains. The β-catenin reporter activities are shown as WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios (in triplicate, three independent experiments), in which the value obtained for <t>wild-type</t> AXIN1 was arbitrarily set to 1. As a positive control for increased β-catenin signaling, Wnt3A conditioned medium was added to empty vector (EV)-transfected cells (EV+Wnt3A). Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; ns, nonsignificant.
Human Axin, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human axin/product/OriGene
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human axin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriGene human axin1 myc ddk
( a ) Immunostaining of AURKA, p-T288 AURKA (left), and microtubules (MTs) with Hoechst 33342 to stain DNA (left). See also Extended Data Table 1. Ratios of fluorescence intensities (phosphorylated vs. total protein) of AURKA (T288) and PLK1 (T210), and fluorescence intensities of γ-tubulin at centrosomes are shown (right). Scale bars: 5 μm. ( b ) Binding sites for centrosomal proteins and components of the β-catenin destruction complex. ( c ) In vitro AURKA autophosphorylation at T288 detected by western blotting. ( d ) In vitro kinase assay of AURKA autophosphorylation. ( e, f ) HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-fused AURKA, <t>AXIN1,</t> β-catenin, and APC fragments (see Extended Data Figure 3a) as indicated and then subjected to western blotting using the indicated antibodies. APC bands are marked with asterisks. Note that the phosphorylated AURKA band always appeared as multiple bands and AXIN1 levels were increased when coexpressed with binding APC fragments. For uncropped versions of blots, see Extended Data Table 2. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-test (a), Tukey–Kramer method (c, d)
Human Axin1 Myc Ddk, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human axin1 myc ddk/product/OriGene
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human axin1 myc ddk - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
OriGene axin1
( a ) Immunostaining of AURKA, p-T288 AURKA (left), and microtubules (MTs) with Hoechst 33342 to stain DNA (left). See also Extended Data Table 1. Ratios of fluorescence intensities (phosphorylated vs. total protein) of AURKA (T288) and PLK1 (T210), and fluorescence intensities of γ-tubulin at centrosomes are shown (right). Scale bars: 5 μm. ( b ) Binding sites for centrosomal proteins and components of the β-catenin destruction complex. ( c ) In vitro AURKA autophosphorylation at T288 detected by western blotting. ( d ) In vitro kinase assay of AURKA autophosphorylation. ( e, f ) HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-fused AURKA, <t>AXIN1,</t> β-catenin, and APC fragments (see Extended Data Figure 3a) as indicated and then subjected to western blotting using the indicated antibodies. APC bands are marked with asterisks. Note that the phosphorylated AURKA band always appeared as multiple bands and AXIN1 levels were increased when coexpressed with binding APC fragments. For uncropped versions of blots, see Extended Data Table 2. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-test (a), Tukey–Kramer method (c, d)
Axin1, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/axin1/product/OriGene
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
axin1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriGene axin 1 (axin1) (nm_003502) human untagged clone
( a ) Immunostaining of AURKA, p-T288 AURKA (left), and microtubules (MTs) with Hoechst 33342 to stain DNA (left). See also Extended Data Table 1. Ratios of fluorescence intensities (phosphorylated vs. total protein) of AURKA (T288) and PLK1 (T210), and fluorescence intensities of γ-tubulin at centrosomes are shown (right). Scale bars: 5 μm. ( b ) Binding sites for centrosomal proteins and components of the β-catenin destruction complex. ( c ) In vitro AURKA autophosphorylation at T288 detected by western blotting. ( d ) In vitro kinase assay of AURKA autophosphorylation. ( e, f ) HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-fused AURKA, <t>AXIN1,</t> β-catenin, and APC fragments (see Extended Data Figure 3a) as indicated and then subjected to western blotting using the indicated antibodies. APC bands are marked with asterisks. Note that the phosphorylated AURKA band always appeared as multiple bands and AXIN1 levels were increased when coexpressed with binding APC fragments. For uncropped versions of blots, see Extended Data Table 2. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-test (a), Tukey–Kramer method (c, d)
Axin 1 (Axin1) (Nm 003502) Human Untagged Clone, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/axin 1 (axin1) (nm_003502) human untagged clone/product/OriGene
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
axin 1 (axin1) (nm_003502) human untagged clone - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriGene axin 1 (axin1) (nm_003502) human 3' utr clone
( a ) Immunostaining of AURKA, p-T288 AURKA (left), and microtubules (MTs) with Hoechst 33342 to stain DNA (left). See also Extended Data Table 1. Ratios of fluorescence intensities (phosphorylated vs. total protein) of AURKA (T288) and PLK1 (T210), and fluorescence intensities of γ-tubulin at centrosomes are shown (right). Scale bars: 5 μm. ( b ) Binding sites for centrosomal proteins and components of the β-catenin destruction complex. ( c ) In vitro AURKA autophosphorylation at T288 detected by western blotting. ( d ) In vitro kinase assay of AURKA autophosphorylation. ( e, f ) HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-fused AURKA, <t>AXIN1,</t> β-catenin, and APC fragments (see Extended Data Figure 3a) as indicated and then subjected to western blotting using the indicated antibodies. APC bands are marked with asterisks. Note that the phosphorylated AURKA band always appeared as multiple bands and AXIN1 levels were increased when coexpressed with binding APC fragments. For uncropped versions of blots, see Extended Data Table 2. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-test (a), Tukey–Kramer method (c, d)
Axin 1 (Axin1) (Nm 003502) Human 3' Utr Clone, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/axin 1 (axin1) (nm_003502) human 3' utr clone/product/OriGene
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
axin 1 (axin1) (nm_003502) human 3' utr clone - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech axin1 2
( a ) Immunostaining of AURKA, p-T288 AURKA (left), and microtubules (MTs) with Hoechst 33342 to stain DNA (left). See also Extended Data Table 1. Ratios of fluorescence intensities (phosphorylated vs. total protein) of AURKA (T288) and PLK1 (T210), and fluorescence intensities of γ-tubulin at centrosomes are shown (right). Scale bars: 5 μm. ( b ) Binding sites for centrosomal proteins and components of the β-catenin destruction complex. ( c ) In vitro AURKA autophosphorylation at T288 detected by western blotting. ( d ) In vitro kinase assay of AURKA autophosphorylation. ( e, f ) HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-fused AURKA, <t>AXIN1,</t> β-catenin, and APC fragments (see Extended Data Figure 3a) as indicated and then subjected to western blotting using the indicated antibodies. APC bands are marked with asterisks. Note that the phosphorylated AURKA band always appeared as multiple bands and AXIN1 levels were increased when coexpressed with binding APC fragments. For uncropped versions of blots, see Extended Data Table 2. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-test (a), Tukey–Kramer method (c, d)
Axin1 2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/axin1 2/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
axin1 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Deletion of the GSK3β and β-catenin–binding domains strongly increases β-catenin signaling. A, Schematic diagram depicting the FLAG-tagged AXIN1 mutant expression vectors that were generated. Amino acid numbers are based on the long 862 amino acid isoform of AXIN1. For clarity, we refer to each domain by one reported binding partner, but especially for the MEKK1, CK1, and PP2A domains; additional binding proteins have been reported. B, Immunoblot for FLAG-tagged AXIN1 to demonstrate expression of the expected variants after HEK293T transfection. Tubulin was used as loading control. C, A β-catenin reporter assay was conducted in HEK293T cells expressing WT AXIN1 and variants lacking the depicted domains. The β-catenin reporter activities are shown as WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios (in triplicate, three independent experiments), in which the value obtained for wild-type AXIN1 was arbitrarily set to 1. As a positive control for increased β-catenin signaling, Wnt3A conditioned medium was added to empty vector (EV)-transfected cells (EV+Wnt3A). Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; ns, nonsignificant.

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Analysis of Tumor-Associated AXIN1 Missense Mutations Identifies Variants That Activate β-Catenin Signaling

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-2268

Figure Lengend Snippet: Deletion of the GSK3β and β-catenin–binding domains strongly increases β-catenin signaling. A, Schematic diagram depicting the FLAG-tagged AXIN1 mutant expression vectors that were generated. Amino acid numbers are based on the long 862 amino acid isoform of AXIN1. For clarity, we refer to each domain by one reported binding partner, but especially for the MEKK1, CK1, and PP2A domains; additional binding proteins have been reported. B, Immunoblot for FLAG-tagged AXIN1 to demonstrate expression of the expected variants after HEK293T transfection. Tubulin was used as loading control. C, A β-catenin reporter assay was conducted in HEK293T cells expressing WT AXIN1 and variants lacking the depicted domains. The β-catenin reporter activities are shown as WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios (in triplicate, three independent experiments), in which the value obtained for wild-type AXIN1 was arbitrarily set to 1. As a positive control for increased β-catenin signaling, Wnt3A conditioned medium was added to empty vector (EV)-transfected cells (EV+Wnt3A). Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; ns, nonsignificant.

Article Snippet: Wild-type (WT) FLAG-AXIN1 (cat. #109370, RRID:Addgene_109370) and HA GSK3β wt pcDNA3 (cat. #14753, RRID:Addgene_14753) were purchased from Addgene.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Mutagenesis, Expressing, Generated, Western Blot, Transfection, Reporter Assay, Positive Control, Plasmid Preparation, MANN-WHITNEY

Analysis of β-catenin signaling in cell clones with endogenous knockout of the GSK3β and β-catenin domains. HEK293T and SNU449 AXIN1-repaired cells were used to knockout the GSK3β-binding domain encoded by exon 5. We also identified one HEK293T clone with an endogenous knockout of the β-catenin–binding region. A, Immunoblot using an N-terminal AXIN1 antibody (cat. #3323, Cell Signaling Technology) to show expression of the shortened AXIN1 proteins. β-Actin served as a loading control. B, qRT-PCR assay to demonstrate the mRNA expression level of AXIN2 (in triplicate, n = 2 independent experiments). Expression levels were depicted relative to the housekeeping gene GAPDH . The value for the WT control was arbitrarily set to 1. C, A β-catenin luciferase reporter assay was performed to determine the β-catenin signaling activity in all knockout clones. Values are depicted as WRE/MRE ratios (in triplicate, n = 3 independent experiments). The value for the WT control was arbitrarily set to 1. D, siRNA-mediated knockdown of AXIN2 was performed in all knockout clones, followed by a β-catenin reporter assay. Values are depicted relative to the WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios obtained for the siControl-WT (five replicates, two independent experiments), which was arbitrarily set to 1. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance for all experiments was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Analysis of Tumor-Associated AXIN1 Missense Mutations Identifies Variants That Activate β-Catenin Signaling

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-2268

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of β-catenin signaling in cell clones with endogenous knockout of the GSK3β and β-catenin domains. HEK293T and SNU449 AXIN1-repaired cells were used to knockout the GSK3β-binding domain encoded by exon 5. We also identified one HEK293T clone with an endogenous knockout of the β-catenin–binding region. A, Immunoblot using an N-terminal AXIN1 antibody (cat. #3323, Cell Signaling Technology) to show expression of the shortened AXIN1 proteins. β-Actin served as a loading control. B, qRT-PCR assay to demonstrate the mRNA expression level of AXIN2 (in triplicate, n = 2 independent experiments). Expression levels were depicted relative to the housekeeping gene GAPDH . The value for the WT control was arbitrarily set to 1. C, A β-catenin luciferase reporter assay was performed to determine the β-catenin signaling activity in all knockout clones. Values are depicted as WRE/MRE ratios (in triplicate, n = 3 independent experiments). The value for the WT control was arbitrarily set to 1. D, siRNA-mediated knockdown of AXIN2 was performed in all knockout clones, followed by a β-catenin reporter assay. Values are depicted relative to the WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios obtained for the siControl-WT (five replicates, two independent experiments), which was arbitrarily set to 1. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance for all experiments was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Wild-type (WT) FLAG-AXIN1 (cat. #109370, RRID:Addgene_109370) and HA GSK3β wt pcDNA3 (cat. #14753, RRID:Addgene_14753) were purchased from Addgene.

Techniques: Clone Assay, Knock-Out, Binding Assay, Western Blot, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Activity Assay, MANN-WHITNEY

Analysis of missense variants in the GSK3β-binding domain. Tumor-associated missense variants within the GSK3β-binding domain were tested for their effect on β-catenin signaling regulation. A, Schematic diagram indicating the sequential amino acid deletions within the GSK3β domain that were generated in the AXIN1 expression plasmid. B, A β-catenin reporter assay was performed to show the defect in β-catenin regulation associated with the variants shown in A . C, Immunoprecipitation experiment following cotransfection with HA-tagged GSK3β to identify which deletion variants shown in A affect GSK3β binding. AXIN1 and GSK3β were detected using anti-FLAG and anti-GSK3β antibodies, respectively. Transfection with empty vector (EV) and nontransfected cells were used as negative controls. D, Schematic diagram depicting the selected tumor-associated missense variants within the V383-T402 domain. These 12 variants were the only ones reported in the cBioPortal and COSMIC databases until January 2021. E, A β-catenin reporter assay to determine the defect in β-catenin regulation for the missense variants is shown in D . F, Immunoprecipitation experiment following cotransfection with HA-tagged GSK3β to identify which missense variants shown in D affect GSK3β binding. Image is a composite of two original blots (see Supplementary Data S1) in which the AXIN1 variants have been arranged in numerical order. G, Cartoon representation of GSK3β (gray) with bound Axin1 α-helix (deep teal). Right, details of the interaction interface with amino acid sidechains in stick representation with nitrogen atoms (blue) and oxygen (red). Dashed line, hydrogen bond between Aspartate D264 in GSK3β and Arginine R395 in Axin1. AXIN1 residues mutated in this study are labeled. All β-catenin reporter activities are depicted as WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios (in triplicate, two independent experiments), in which the value obtained for the empty vector was arbitrarily set to 1. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance for all experiments was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Analysis of Tumor-Associated AXIN1 Missense Mutations Identifies Variants That Activate β-Catenin Signaling

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-2268

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of missense variants in the GSK3β-binding domain. Tumor-associated missense variants within the GSK3β-binding domain were tested for their effect on β-catenin signaling regulation. A, Schematic diagram indicating the sequential amino acid deletions within the GSK3β domain that were generated in the AXIN1 expression plasmid. B, A β-catenin reporter assay was performed to show the defect in β-catenin regulation associated with the variants shown in A . C, Immunoprecipitation experiment following cotransfection with HA-tagged GSK3β to identify which deletion variants shown in A affect GSK3β binding. AXIN1 and GSK3β were detected using anti-FLAG and anti-GSK3β antibodies, respectively. Transfection with empty vector (EV) and nontransfected cells were used as negative controls. D, Schematic diagram depicting the selected tumor-associated missense variants within the V383-T402 domain. These 12 variants were the only ones reported in the cBioPortal and COSMIC databases until January 2021. E, A β-catenin reporter assay to determine the defect in β-catenin regulation for the missense variants is shown in D . F, Immunoprecipitation experiment following cotransfection with HA-tagged GSK3β to identify which missense variants shown in D affect GSK3β binding. Image is a composite of two original blots (see Supplementary Data S1) in which the AXIN1 variants have been arranged in numerical order. G, Cartoon representation of GSK3β (gray) with bound Axin1 α-helix (deep teal). Right, details of the interaction interface with amino acid sidechains in stick representation with nitrogen atoms (blue) and oxygen (red). Dashed line, hydrogen bond between Aspartate D264 in GSK3β and Arginine R395 in Axin1. AXIN1 residues mutated in this study are labeled. All β-catenin reporter activities are depicted as WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios (in triplicate, two independent experiments), in which the value obtained for the empty vector was arbitrarily set to 1. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance for all experiments was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: Wild-type (WT) FLAG-AXIN1 (cat. #109370, RRID:Addgene_109370) and HA GSK3β wt pcDNA3 (cat. #14753, RRID:Addgene_14753) were purchased from Addgene.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Generated, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Reporter Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Cotransfection, Transfection, Labeling, MANN-WHITNEY

Missense variants in the β-catenin–binding domain mostly retain functionality. Tumor-associated missense variants within the β-catenin–binding domain were tested for their effect on β-catenin signaling regulation. A, Schematic diagram of the indicated sequential amino acid deletions that were generated in the AXIN1 expression plasmid. B, A β-catenin reporter assay was performed to show the defect in β-catenin regulation associated with the variants shown in A . C, Schematic diagram depicting the 15 selected tumor-associated missense variants within the R450_P503 domain. D, A β-catenin reporter assay to determine the defect in β-catenin regulation for the missense variants shown in C . Reporter activities are depicted as WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios (mean ± SD; three independent experiments), in which the value obtained for the empty vector (EV) was arbitrarily set to 1. E, Immunoprecipitation experiment with FLAG-tagged AXIN1 variants to identify which domain deletions affect endogenous β-catenin binding. F, Immunoprecipitation experiment with depicted FLAG-tagged AXIN1 missense variants to determine β-catenin–binding capacity. Deletion of the N-terminal half of AXIN1 up to the β-catenin domain (M1_G430del) was used to allow a better evaluation. A larger deletion (M1_P503del) also removing the β-catenin domain was used as negative control. Cotransfected GFP–β-catenin and endogenous β-catenin were detected using a β-catenin antibody. In all IP experiments, transfection with EV and nontransfected cells was used as negative controls. Data are shown as mean ± SD. G, Cartoon representation of β-catenin (gray) with bound AXIN1 α-helix (deep teal). Side chains of amino acid residues that are mutated in this study are indicated in stick representation, with nitrogen atoms (blue) and oxygen (red). Right, close-up of the region around AXIN1 residue Valine 478. Statistical significance for all experiments was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Analysis of Tumor-Associated AXIN1 Missense Mutations Identifies Variants That Activate β-Catenin Signaling

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-2268

Figure Lengend Snippet: Missense variants in the β-catenin–binding domain mostly retain functionality. Tumor-associated missense variants within the β-catenin–binding domain were tested for their effect on β-catenin signaling regulation. A, Schematic diagram of the indicated sequential amino acid deletions that were generated in the AXIN1 expression plasmid. B, A β-catenin reporter assay was performed to show the defect in β-catenin regulation associated with the variants shown in A . C, Schematic diagram depicting the 15 selected tumor-associated missense variants within the R450_P503 domain. D, A β-catenin reporter assay to determine the defect in β-catenin regulation for the missense variants shown in C . Reporter activities are depicted as WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios (mean ± SD; three independent experiments), in which the value obtained for the empty vector (EV) was arbitrarily set to 1. E, Immunoprecipitation experiment with FLAG-tagged AXIN1 variants to identify which domain deletions affect endogenous β-catenin binding. F, Immunoprecipitation experiment with depicted FLAG-tagged AXIN1 missense variants to determine β-catenin–binding capacity. Deletion of the N-terminal half of AXIN1 up to the β-catenin domain (M1_G430del) was used to allow a better evaluation. A larger deletion (M1_P503del) also removing the β-catenin domain was used as negative control. Cotransfected GFP–β-catenin and endogenous β-catenin were detected using a β-catenin antibody. In all IP experiments, transfection with EV and nontransfected cells was used as negative controls. Data are shown as mean ± SD. G, Cartoon representation of β-catenin (gray) with bound AXIN1 α-helix (deep teal). Side chains of amino acid residues that are mutated in this study are indicated in stick representation, with nitrogen atoms (blue) and oxygen (red). Right, close-up of the region around AXIN1 residue Valine 478. Statistical significance for all experiments was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Wild-type (WT) FLAG-AXIN1 (cat. #109370, RRID:Addgene_109370) and HA GSK3β wt pcDNA3 (cat. #14753, RRID:Addgene_14753) were purchased from Addgene.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Generated, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Reporter Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Negative Control, Transfection, Residue, MANN-WHITNEY

Analysis of missense variants within the RGS/APC domain. Tumor-associated missense variants in the RGS/APC domain were analyzed for their defect in β-catenin regulation, APC and β-catenin binding, and capacity to induce intracellular puncta formation. A, A β-catenin reporter assay was performed to determine the defect in β-catenin regulation for 37 RGS/APC domain variants. Red-marked bars represent variants that show a near-complete loss of GFP-APC and/or β-catenin binding (see ), whereas orange bars represent variants with partial loss. All β-catenin reporter activities are depicted as WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios (in triplicate, three independent experiments), in which the value obtained for the empty vector (EV) was arbitrarily set to 1. B, Immunoprecipitation assay to determine the binding capacity of missense variants to cotransfected GFP-APC or endogenous β-catenin. C, Immunofluorescence analysis of transfected AXIN1 missense variants to determine their puncta formation capacity. Average dot size was determined using ImageJ software on at least 6 independent cells. Data are shown as mean ± SD. D, Surface representation of AXIN1 (gray) with bound APC helix (deep teal). Amino acid residues mutated in this study that are located on the surface of AXIN1 are labeled and colored according to extent of loss of APC binding , with yellow indicating no loss, orange indicating partial loss, and red indicating near-complete loss of APC binding. Statistical significance for all experiments was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Analysis of Tumor-Associated AXIN1 Missense Mutations Identifies Variants That Activate β-Catenin Signaling

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-2268

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of missense variants within the RGS/APC domain. Tumor-associated missense variants in the RGS/APC domain were analyzed for their defect in β-catenin regulation, APC and β-catenin binding, and capacity to induce intracellular puncta formation. A, A β-catenin reporter assay was performed to determine the defect in β-catenin regulation for 37 RGS/APC domain variants. Red-marked bars represent variants that show a near-complete loss of GFP-APC and/or β-catenin binding (see ), whereas orange bars represent variants with partial loss. All β-catenin reporter activities are depicted as WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios (in triplicate, three independent experiments), in which the value obtained for the empty vector (EV) was arbitrarily set to 1. B, Immunoprecipitation assay to determine the binding capacity of missense variants to cotransfected GFP-APC or endogenous β-catenin. C, Immunofluorescence analysis of transfected AXIN1 missense variants to determine their puncta formation capacity. Average dot size was determined using ImageJ software on at least 6 independent cells. Data are shown as mean ± SD. D, Surface representation of AXIN1 (gray) with bound APC helix (deep teal). Amino acid residues mutated in this study that are located on the surface of AXIN1 are labeled and colored according to extent of loss of APC binding , with yellow indicating no loss, orange indicating partial loss, and red indicating near-complete loss of APC binding. Statistical significance for all experiments was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Wild-type (WT) FLAG-AXIN1 (cat. #109370, RRID:Addgene_109370) and HA GSK3β wt pcDNA3 (cat. #14753, RRID:Addgene_14753) were purchased from Addgene.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Reporter Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Immunoprecipitation, Immunofluorescence, Transfection, Software, Labeling, MANN-WHITNEY

Immunohistochemical analysis of induced liver tumors in mice. An example is shown of two adjacent AXIN1–R395P-induced liver lesions. IHC was performed to reveal expression of transfected Myc-tagged AXIN1, endogenous location of β-catenin, and Ki67 to identify proliferating cells. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining revealed mostly slight increases in hepatocyte size and mild-to-moderate nuclear atypia. Scale bar, 250 μm.

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Analysis of Tumor-Associated AXIN1 Missense Mutations Identifies Variants That Activate β-Catenin Signaling

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-2268

Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunohistochemical analysis of induced liver tumors in mice. An example is shown of two adjacent AXIN1–R395P-induced liver lesions. IHC was performed to reveal expression of transfected Myc-tagged AXIN1, endogenous location of β-catenin, and Ki67 to identify proliferating cells. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining revealed mostly slight increases in hepatocyte size and mild-to-moderate nuclear atypia. Scale bar, 250 μm.

Article Snippet: Wild-type (WT) FLAG-AXIN1 (cat. #109370, RRID:Addgene_109370) and HA GSK3β wt pcDNA3 (cat. #14753, RRID:Addgene_14753) were purchased from Addgene.

Techniques: Immunohistochemical staining, Expressing, Transfection, Staining

Characterization of AXIN1-truncating mutations in regulating β-catenin signaling. Analysis of clones carrying various endogenous AXIN1 truncations generated in HEK293T cells using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. A, Schematic diagram showing the AXIN1 truncation variants generated in HEK293T cells using gene editing. The red domain at the end of truncated variants represents amino acid stretches resulting from the introduced frameshift mutation. B, Immunoblot analysis of generated clones using AXIN1 antibodies with N- and more C-terminal epitopes (cat. # 3323S and cat. #2087S, Cell Signaling Technology). Images were generated from one blot for each antibody, with irrelevant lanes removed. Original blots can be seen in Supplementary Data S1. C, qRT-PCR assay to determine AXIN1 mRNA expression levels (in triplicate, two independent experiments). Expression levels are depicted relative to the housekeeping gene GAPDH . The value for the WT control was arbitrarily set to 1. D, A β-catenin reporter assay was performed to determine β-catenin signaling levels in AXIN1-truncated clones. Values are depicted as WRE/MRE ratios (mean ± SD; in triplicate; three independent experiments). The value for the WT control was arbitrarily set to 1. E, Following siRNA-mediated knockdown of AXIN2 , a β-catenin reporter assay was performed in all AXIN1-truncated clones. Values are depicted relative to the WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios obtained for the siControl-WT, which was arbitrarily set to 1. Note the logarithmic scale. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance for all experiments was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ns, nonsignificant.

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Analysis of Tumor-Associated AXIN1 Missense Mutations Identifies Variants That Activate β-Catenin Signaling

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-2268

Figure Lengend Snippet: Characterization of AXIN1-truncating mutations in regulating β-catenin signaling. Analysis of clones carrying various endogenous AXIN1 truncations generated in HEK293T cells using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. A, Schematic diagram showing the AXIN1 truncation variants generated in HEK293T cells using gene editing. The red domain at the end of truncated variants represents amino acid stretches resulting from the introduced frameshift mutation. B, Immunoblot analysis of generated clones using AXIN1 antibodies with N- and more C-terminal epitopes (cat. # 3323S and cat. #2087S, Cell Signaling Technology). Images were generated from one blot for each antibody, with irrelevant lanes removed. Original blots can be seen in Supplementary Data S1. C, qRT-PCR assay to determine AXIN1 mRNA expression levels (in triplicate, two independent experiments). Expression levels are depicted relative to the housekeeping gene GAPDH . The value for the WT control was arbitrarily set to 1. D, A β-catenin reporter assay was performed to determine β-catenin signaling levels in AXIN1-truncated clones. Values are depicted as WRE/MRE ratios (mean ± SD; in triplicate; three independent experiments). The value for the WT control was arbitrarily set to 1. E, Following siRNA-mediated knockdown of AXIN2 , a β-catenin reporter assay was performed in all AXIN1-truncated clones. Values are depicted relative to the WRE/CMV- Renilla ratios obtained for the siControl-WT, which was arbitrarily set to 1. Note the logarithmic scale. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance for all experiments was analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ns, nonsignificant.

Article Snippet: Wild-type (WT) FLAG-AXIN1 (cat. #109370, RRID:Addgene_109370) and HA GSK3β wt pcDNA3 (cat. #14753, RRID:Addgene_14753) were purchased from Addgene.

Techniques: Clone Assay, Generated, CRISPR, Mutagenesis, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Reporter Assay, MANN-WHITNEY

Co-occurrence of mutations in β-catenin–related genes observed in AXIN1-mutant HCC and colorectal cancer tumors. From the cBioPortal database, we obtained information from AXIN1-mutant HCC and colorectal cancer (CRC) tumors about APC , CTNNB1 , and BRAF mutation status, in addition to colorectal cancer tumor location and MSI-status. A, Identification of oncogenic β-catenin mutations in HCC tumors carrying either truncating ( n = 49) or missense ( n = 15) AXIN1 mutations. B, Identification of oncogenic β-catenin or inactivating APC mutations in colorectal cancer tumors carrying either truncating ( n = 15) or missense ( n = 58) AXIN1 mutations. The BRAF mutation (light blue) is the classical BRAF-V600E variant. Gray, microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer tumors carrying a mismatch repair defect. Colorectal cancer tumor location is defined as being located on left- or right-sided of the splenic flexure. Identity of the specific β-catenin and APC mutations can be found in Supplementary Table S7.

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: Analysis of Tumor-Associated AXIN1 Missense Mutations Identifies Variants That Activate β-Catenin Signaling

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-2268

Figure Lengend Snippet: Co-occurrence of mutations in β-catenin–related genes observed in AXIN1-mutant HCC and colorectal cancer tumors. From the cBioPortal database, we obtained information from AXIN1-mutant HCC and colorectal cancer (CRC) tumors about APC , CTNNB1 , and BRAF mutation status, in addition to colorectal cancer tumor location and MSI-status. A, Identification of oncogenic β-catenin mutations in HCC tumors carrying either truncating ( n = 49) or missense ( n = 15) AXIN1 mutations. B, Identification of oncogenic β-catenin or inactivating APC mutations in colorectal cancer tumors carrying either truncating ( n = 15) or missense ( n = 58) AXIN1 mutations. The BRAF mutation (light blue) is the classical BRAF-V600E variant. Gray, microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer tumors carrying a mismatch repair defect. Colorectal cancer tumor location is defined as being located on left- or right-sided of the splenic flexure. Identity of the specific β-catenin and APC mutations can be found in Supplementary Table S7.

Article Snippet: Wild-type (WT) FLAG-AXIN1 (cat. #109370, RRID:Addgene_109370) and HA GSK3β wt pcDNA3 (cat. #14753, RRID:Addgene_14753) were purchased from Addgene.

Techniques: Mutagenesis, Variant Assay

( a ) Immunostaining of AURKA, p-T288 AURKA (left), and microtubules (MTs) with Hoechst 33342 to stain DNA (left). See also Extended Data Table 1. Ratios of fluorescence intensities (phosphorylated vs. total protein) of AURKA (T288) and PLK1 (T210), and fluorescence intensities of γ-tubulin at centrosomes are shown (right). Scale bars: 5 μm. ( b ) Binding sites for centrosomal proteins and components of the β-catenin destruction complex. ( c ) In vitro AURKA autophosphorylation at T288 detected by western blotting. ( d ) In vitro kinase assay of AURKA autophosphorylation. ( e, f ) HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-fused AURKA, AXIN1, β-catenin, and APC fragments (see Extended Data Figure 3a) as indicated and then subjected to western blotting using the indicated antibodies. APC bands are marked with asterisks. Note that the phosphorylated AURKA band always appeared as multiple bands and AXIN1 levels were increased when coexpressed with binding APC fragments. For uncropped versions of blots, see Extended Data Table 2. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-test (a), Tukey–Kramer method (c, d)

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: APC -mutant cells exploit compensatory chromosome alterations to restore tumour cell fitness

doi: 10.1101/2020.09.18.303016

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Immunostaining of AURKA, p-T288 AURKA (left), and microtubules (MTs) with Hoechst 33342 to stain DNA (left). See also Extended Data Table 1. Ratios of fluorescence intensities (phosphorylated vs. total protein) of AURKA (T288) and PLK1 (T210), and fluorescence intensities of γ-tubulin at centrosomes are shown (right). Scale bars: 5 μm. ( b ) Binding sites for centrosomal proteins and components of the β-catenin destruction complex. ( c ) In vitro AURKA autophosphorylation at T288 detected by western blotting. ( d ) In vitro kinase assay of AURKA autophosphorylation. ( e, f ) HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-fused AURKA, AXIN1, β-catenin, and APC fragments (see Extended Data Figure 3a) as indicated and then subjected to western blotting using the indicated antibodies. APC bands are marked with asterisks. Note that the phosphorylated AURKA band always appeared as multiple bands and AXIN1 levels were increased when coexpressed with binding APC fragments. For uncropped versions of blots, see Extended Data Table 2. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-test (a), Tukey–Kramer method (c, d)

Article Snippet: Purified human AXIN1-MYC/DDK (TP308349) and TPX2-MYC/DDK (TP305821) proteins were obtained from OriGene Technologies (Rockville, MD, USA).

Techniques: Immunostaining, Staining, Fluorescence, Binding Assay, In Vitro, Western Blot, Kinase Assay, Transfection

( a, b ) Domain structures of APC and AXIN1, and the analysed fragments. Amino acid numbering is based on human APC transcript variant 3 (NM_000038) and human AXIN1 transcript variant 1 (NM_003502). Associations of APC with AURKA and AXIN1 were assessed by in-cell colocalization analysis using a series of deletion mutants. The results are shown on the right. ( c ) Direct binding between APC fragments and AURKA/AXIN1/ch-TOG predicted in (a) was confirmed by in vitro pull-down assays using purified proteins. The APC arm and APC-C6 bound to AURKA. The APC arm also bound to the C-terminal DIX domain of AXIN1. XMAP215 , the Xenopus homologue of ch-TOG, bound to APC-C3. We used Xenopus XMAP215 because we could not purify full-length human ch-TOG from E. coli . The C-terminal one-third bound to the APC arm. See also Extended Data Table 2. ( d ) Yeast two-hybrid screening using the APC arm region as bait identified pericentrin. The two identified pericentrin clones are shown.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: APC -mutant cells exploit compensatory chromosome alterations to restore tumour cell fitness

doi: 10.1101/2020.09.18.303016

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a, b ) Domain structures of APC and AXIN1, and the analysed fragments. Amino acid numbering is based on human APC transcript variant 3 (NM_000038) and human AXIN1 transcript variant 1 (NM_003502). Associations of APC with AURKA and AXIN1 were assessed by in-cell colocalization analysis using a series of deletion mutants. The results are shown on the right. ( c ) Direct binding between APC fragments and AURKA/AXIN1/ch-TOG predicted in (a) was confirmed by in vitro pull-down assays using purified proteins. The APC arm and APC-C6 bound to AURKA. The APC arm also bound to the C-terminal DIX domain of AXIN1. XMAP215 , the Xenopus homologue of ch-TOG, bound to APC-C3. We used Xenopus XMAP215 because we could not purify full-length human ch-TOG from E. coli . The C-terminal one-third bound to the APC arm. See also Extended Data Table 2. ( d ) Yeast two-hybrid screening using the APC arm region as bait identified pericentrin. The two identified pericentrin clones are shown.

Article Snippet: Purified human AXIN1-MYC/DDK (TP308349) and TPX2-MYC/DDK (TP305821) proteins were obtained from OriGene Technologies (Rockville, MD, USA).

Techniques: Variant Assay, Binding Assay, In Vitro, Purification, Two Hybrid Screening, Clone Assay

( a ) AXIN1 structure and AURKA-activating region that also binds to β-catenin . ( b ) Effects of AXIN1 on AURKA phosphorylation were analysed using the HEK293T cell overexpression assay system. HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-fused AURKA and full-length AXIN1 or fragments, lysed, and then subjected to western blot analysis using anti-GFP and anti-p-T288 AURKA antibodies. The left panel is same with . See also Extended Data Table 2. ( c, d ) Analysis of primary MEFs from wildtype (WT) and Apc 1638T mice. Immunostaining of microtubules (MTs), γ-tubulin, AURKA, and p-T288 AURKA (c). Immunostaining intensity of γ-tubulin, total AURKA protein levels (t-AURKA), autophosphorylated AURKA levels (p-AURKA), and the autophosphorylation ratio (p-AURKA/t-AURKA ratio) were normalized to those of the wildtype, which were set to 1.0 (d). Scale bars: 5 μm. ***P < 0.001; Student’s t-test.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: APC -mutant cells exploit compensatory chromosome alterations to restore tumour cell fitness

doi: 10.1101/2020.09.18.303016

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) AXIN1 structure and AURKA-activating region that also binds to β-catenin . ( b ) Effects of AXIN1 on AURKA phosphorylation were analysed using the HEK293T cell overexpression assay system. HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-fused AURKA and full-length AXIN1 or fragments, lysed, and then subjected to western blot analysis using anti-GFP and anti-p-T288 AURKA antibodies. The left panel is same with . See also Extended Data Table 2. ( c, d ) Analysis of primary MEFs from wildtype (WT) and Apc 1638T mice. Immunostaining of microtubules (MTs), γ-tubulin, AURKA, and p-T288 AURKA (c). Immunostaining intensity of γ-tubulin, total AURKA protein levels (t-AURKA), autophosphorylated AURKA levels (p-AURKA), and the autophosphorylation ratio (p-AURKA/t-AURKA ratio) were normalized to those of the wildtype, which were set to 1.0 (d). Scale bars: 5 μm. ***P < 0.001; Student’s t-test.

Article Snippet: Purified human AXIN1-MYC/DDK (TP308349) and TPX2-MYC/DDK (TP305821) proteins were obtained from OriGene Technologies (Rockville, MD, USA).

Techniques: Over Expression, Transfection, Western Blot, Immunostaining

( a ) AURKA status at centrosomes obtained from immunofluorescence images. See also Extended Data Table 1. Total AURKA protein levels (t-AURKA), autophosphorylated AURKA levels (p-AURKA), the auto-phosphorylation ratio (p-AURKA/t-AURKA ratio), and mitotic error rate in parental MCF10A cells that expressed full-length APC, APC883 cells, and cell lines derived from APC883 cells are shown as indicated. Mitotic errors were monitored by generation of lagging chromosomes (lower right). ( b ) Representative images of immunostained MCF10A cells that expressed myc-WTβ-catenin or myc-MMβ-catenin (left) and signal intensity analysis of AURKA (right). ( c ) FRAP analysis of GFP-AURKA in cells that expressed WT β-catenin or MMβ-catenin. Representative images (left) and average FRAP recovery half-time (right) are shown. See also Extended Data Table 1. ( d ) Duration of mitosis in each cell line shown as a cumulative histogram. See also Movies 4–6 and Extended Data Table 1. ( e ) Schematic diagram of AURKA regulation by the APC/AXIN1/β-catenin complex. Scale bars: 5 μm. For (a), ***P < 0.001 vs. MCF10A, ### P < 0.001 vs. APC883, Student’s t-test. ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-test (b, c), Tukey–Kramer method (a, d).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: APC -mutant cells exploit compensatory chromosome alterations to restore tumour cell fitness

doi: 10.1101/2020.09.18.303016

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) AURKA status at centrosomes obtained from immunofluorescence images. See also Extended Data Table 1. Total AURKA protein levels (t-AURKA), autophosphorylated AURKA levels (p-AURKA), the auto-phosphorylation ratio (p-AURKA/t-AURKA ratio), and mitotic error rate in parental MCF10A cells that expressed full-length APC, APC883 cells, and cell lines derived from APC883 cells are shown as indicated. Mitotic errors were monitored by generation of lagging chromosomes (lower right). ( b ) Representative images of immunostained MCF10A cells that expressed myc-WTβ-catenin or myc-MMβ-catenin (left) and signal intensity analysis of AURKA (right). ( c ) FRAP analysis of GFP-AURKA in cells that expressed WT β-catenin or MMβ-catenin. Representative images (left) and average FRAP recovery half-time (right) are shown. See also Extended Data Table 1. ( d ) Duration of mitosis in each cell line shown as a cumulative histogram. See also Movies 4–6 and Extended Data Table 1. ( e ) Schematic diagram of AURKA regulation by the APC/AXIN1/β-catenin complex. Scale bars: 5 μm. For (a), ***P < 0.001 vs. MCF10A, ### P < 0.001 vs. APC883, Student’s t-test. ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-test (b, c), Tukey–Kramer method (a, d).

Article Snippet: Purified human AXIN1-MYC/DDK (TP308349) and TPX2-MYC/DDK (TP305821) proteins were obtained from OriGene Technologies (Rockville, MD, USA).

Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Derivative Assay

( a ) Immunostaining of AURKA, p-T288 AURKA (left), and microtubules (MTs) with Hoechst 33342 to stain DNA (left). See also Extended Data Table 1. Ratios of fluorescence intensities (phosphorylated vs. total protein) of AURKA (T288) and PLK1 (T210), and fluorescence intensities of γ-tubulin at centrosomes are shown (right). Scale bars: 5 μm. ( b ) Binding sites for centrosomal proteins and components of the β-catenin destruction complex. ( c ) In vitro AURKA autophosphorylation at T288 detected by western blotting. ( d ) In vitro kinase assay of AURKA autophosphorylation. ( e, f ) HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-fused AURKA, AXIN1, β-catenin, and APC fragments (see Extended Data Figure 3a) as indicated and then subjected to western blotting using the indicated antibodies. APC bands are marked with asterisks. Note that the phosphorylated AURKA band always appeared as multiple bands and AXIN1 levels were increased when coexpressed with binding APC fragments. For uncropped versions of blots, see Extended Data Table 2. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-test (a), Tukey–Kramer method (c, d)

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: APC -mutant cells exploit compensatory chromosome alterations to restore tumour cell fitness

doi: 10.1101/2020.09.18.303016

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Immunostaining of AURKA, p-T288 AURKA (left), and microtubules (MTs) with Hoechst 33342 to stain DNA (left). See also Extended Data Table 1. Ratios of fluorescence intensities (phosphorylated vs. total protein) of AURKA (T288) and PLK1 (T210), and fluorescence intensities of γ-tubulin at centrosomes are shown (right). Scale bars: 5 μm. ( b ) Binding sites for centrosomal proteins and components of the β-catenin destruction complex. ( c ) In vitro AURKA autophosphorylation at T288 detected by western blotting. ( d ) In vitro kinase assay of AURKA autophosphorylation. ( e, f ) HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-fused AURKA, AXIN1, β-catenin, and APC fragments (see Extended Data Figure 3a) as indicated and then subjected to western blotting using the indicated antibodies. APC bands are marked with asterisks. Note that the phosphorylated AURKA band always appeared as multiple bands and AXIN1 levels were increased when coexpressed with binding APC fragments. For uncropped versions of blots, see Extended Data Table 2. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-test (a), Tukey–Kramer method (c, d)

Article Snippet: Briefly, inactive AURKA (0.3 pmol; SignalChem) was mixed with various concentrations (0.5-2 pmol) of purified GST, Axin1 (OriGene Technologies) or TPX2 (SignalChem) for 10 min at RT.

Techniques: Immunostaining, Staining, Fluorescence, Binding Assay, In Vitro, Western Blot, Kinase Assay, Transfection

( a, b ) Domain structures of APC and AXIN1, and the analysed fragments. Amino acid numbering is based on human APC transcript variant 3 (NM_000038) and human AXIN1 transcript variant 1 (NM_003502). Associations of APC with AURKA and AXIN1 were assessed by in-cell colocalization analysis using a series of deletion mutants. The results are shown on the right. ( c ) Direct binding between APC fragments and AURKA/AXIN1/ch-TOG predicted in (a) was confirmed by in vitro pull-down assays using purified proteins. The APC arm and APC-C6 bound to AURKA. The APC arm also bound to the C-terminal DIX domain of AXIN1. XMAP215 , the Xenopus homologue of ch-TOG, bound to APC-C3. We used Xenopus XMAP215 because we could not purify full-length human ch-TOG from E. coli . The C-terminal one-third bound to the APC arm. See also Extended Data Table 2. ( d ) Yeast two-hybrid screening using the APC arm region as bait identified pericentrin. The two identified pericentrin clones are shown.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: APC -mutant cells exploit compensatory chromosome alterations to restore tumour cell fitness

doi: 10.1101/2020.09.18.303016

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a, b ) Domain structures of APC and AXIN1, and the analysed fragments. Amino acid numbering is based on human APC transcript variant 3 (NM_000038) and human AXIN1 transcript variant 1 (NM_003502). Associations of APC with AURKA and AXIN1 were assessed by in-cell colocalization analysis using a series of deletion mutants. The results are shown on the right. ( c ) Direct binding between APC fragments and AURKA/AXIN1/ch-TOG predicted in (a) was confirmed by in vitro pull-down assays using purified proteins. The APC arm and APC-C6 bound to AURKA. The APC arm also bound to the C-terminal DIX domain of AXIN1. XMAP215 , the Xenopus homologue of ch-TOG, bound to APC-C3. We used Xenopus XMAP215 because we could not purify full-length human ch-TOG from E. coli . The C-terminal one-third bound to the APC arm. See also Extended Data Table 2. ( d ) Yeast two-hybrid screening using the APC arm region as bait identified pericentrin. The two identified pericentrin clones are shown.

Article Snippet: Briefly, inactive AURKA (0.3 pmol; SignalChem) was mixed with various concentrations (0.5-2 pmol) of purified GST, Axin1 (OriGene Technologies) or TPX2 (SignalChem) for 10 min at RT.

Techniques: Variant Assay, Binding Assay, In Vitro, Purification, Two Hybrid Screening, Clone Assay

( a ) AXIN1 structure and AURKA-activating region that also binds to β-catenin . ( b ) Effects of AXIN1 on AURKA phosphorylation were analysed using the HEK293T cell overexpression assay system. HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-fused AURKA and full-length AXIN1 or fragments, lysed, and then subjected to western blot analysis using anti-GFP and anti-p-T288 AURKA antibodies. The left panel is same with . See also Extended Data Table 2. ( c, d ) Analysis of primary MEFs from wildtype (WT) and Apc 1638T mice. Immunostaining of microtubules (MTs), γ-tubulin, AURKA, and p-T288 AURKA (c). Immunostaining intensity of γ-tubulin, total AURKA protein levels (t-AURKA), autophosphorylated AURKA levels (p-AURKA), and the autophosphorylation ratio (p-AURKA/t-AURKA ratio) were normalized to those of the wildtype, which were set to 1.0 (d). Scale bars: 5 μm. ***P < 0.001; Student’s t-test.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: APC -mutant cells exploit compensatory chromosome alterations to restore tumour cell fitness

doi: 10.1101/2020.09.18.303016

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) AXIN1 structure and AURKA-activating region that also binds to β-catenin . ( b ) Effects of AXIN1 on AURKA phosphorylation were analysed using the HEK293T cell overexpression assay system. HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-fused AURKA and full-length AXIN1 or fragments, lysed, and then subjected to western blot analysis using anti-GFP and anti-p-T288 AURKA antibodies. The left panel is same with . See also Extended Data Table 2. ( c, d ) Analysis of primary MEFs from wildtype (WT) and Apc 1638T mice. Immunostaining of microtubules (MTs), γ-tubulin, AURKA, and p-T288 AURKA (c). Immunostaining intensity of γ-tubulin, total AURKA protein levels (t-AURKA), autophosphorylated AURKA levels (p-AURKA), and the autophosphorylation ratio (p-AURKA/t-AURKA ratio) were normalized to those of the wildtype, which were set to 1.0 (d). Scale bars: 5 μm. ***P < 0.001; Student’s t-test.

Article Snippet: Briefly, inactive AURKA (0.3 pmol; SignalChem) was mixed with various concentrations (0.5-2 pmol) of purified GST, Axin1 (OriGene Technologies) or TPX2 (SignalChem) for 10 min at RT.

Techniques: Over Expression, Transfection, Western Blot, Immunostaining

( a ) AURKA status at centrosomes obtained from immunofluorescence images. See also Extended Data Table 1. Total AURKA protein levels (t-AURKA), autophosphorylated AURKA levels (p-AURKA), the auto-phosphorylation ratio (p-AURKA/t-AURKA ratio), and mitotic error rate in parental MCF10A cells that expressed full-length APC, APC883 cells, and cell lines derived from APC883 cells are shown as indicated. Mitotic errors were monitored by generation of lagging chromosomes (lower right). ( b ) Representative images of immunostained MCF10A cells that expressed myc-WTβ-catenin or myc-MMβ-catenin (left) and signal intensity analysis of AURKA (right). ( c ) FRAP analysis of GFP-AURKA in cells that expressed WT β-catenin or MMβ-catenin. Representative images (left) and average FRAP recovery half-time (right) are shown. See also Extended Data Table 1. ( d ) Duration of mitosis in each cell line shown as a cumulative histogram. See also Movies 4–6 and Extended Data Table 1. ( e ) Schematic diagram of AURKA regulation by the APC/AXIN1/β-catenin complex. Scale bars: 5 μm. For (a), ***P < 0.001 vs. MCF10A, ### P < 0.001 vs. APC883, Student’s t-test. ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-test (b, c), Tukey–Kramer method (a, d).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: APC -mutant cells exploit compensatory chromosome alterations to restore tumour cell fitness

doi: 10.1101/2020.09.18.303016

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) AURKA status at centrosomes obtained from immunofluorescence images. See also Extended Data Table 1. Total AURKA protein levels (t-AURKA), autophosphorylated AURKA levels (p-AURKA), the auto-phosphorylation ratio (p-AURKA/t-AURKA ratio), and mitotic error rate in parental MCF10A cells that expressed full-length APC, APC883 cells, and cell lines derived from APC883 cells are shown as indicated. Mitotic errors were monitored by generation of lagging chromosomes (lower right). ( b ) Representative images of immunostained MCF10A cells that expressed myc-WTβ-catenin or myc-MMβ-catenin (left) and signal intensity analysis of AURKA (right). ( c ) FRAP analysis of GFP-AURKA in cells that expressed WT β-catenin or MMβ-catenin. Representative images (left) and average FRAP recovery half-time (right) are shown. See also Extended Data Table 1. ( d ) Duration of mitosis in each cell line shown as a cumulative histogram. See also Movies 4–6 and Extended Data Table 1. ( e ) Schematic diagram of AURKA regulation by the APC/AXIN1/β-catenin complex. Scale bars: 5 μm. For (a), ***P < 0.001 vs. MCF10A, ### P < 0.001 vs. APC883, Student’s t-test. ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-test (b, c), Tukey–Kramer method (a, d).

Article Snippet: Briefly, inactive AURKA (0.3 pmol; SignalChem) was mixed with various concentrations (0.5-2 pmol) of purified GST, Axin1 (OriGene Technologies) or TPX2 (SignalChem) for 10 min at RT.

Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Derivative Assay